Events List

Home > Events >Events List

06 Oct 2024The Gulf In-Depth 2024

Details:

“A week-long intensive program focusing on strategic aspects of the Arab Gulf.”

This immersive program is ideal for diplomats, business leaders, academics, government officials, and media professionals interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Gulf region's political, economic, and social dynamics.

To apply for the program, a completed online application form must be submitted to the Gulf Research Center. The deadline for registration is three months before the program date.

Place : Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Date : Oct 06 to Oct 10 , 2024
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

01 Mar 2010The Future of Information Technology

Details:

The GRC-FIRST Series of Lectures are organized by the Gulf Research Center (GRC) and the Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Architecture and Software (FIRST). This first series of lectures will discuss: the Future of Information Technology (IT); some Information and Communication technology (ICT) research topics being developed in Germany-based FIRST; and the Fraunhofer model of innovation. Technology highlights will include digital dome projection systems and applications in the fields of medical and Electroencephalography (EEG) technologies.  More generally, the lectures will highlight the future impact and challenges of informatics and ICT, emphasizing the merging trends between the media, communication and information technologies. From a broader perspective, various frameworks to promote innovation and private-public partnership will also be discussed, based on Fraunhofer best practices.



Place : King Saud University, Riyadh and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Date : Mar 01 to Mar 02 , 2010
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

26 Mar 2009The EU as a foreign policy actor in the Middle East: The Mediterranean and the Gulf from a comparative perspective

Details:

Dr. Thomas Demmelhuber, lecturer at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany, gave a guest lecture on EU foreign policy towards the Mediterranean and the Gulf. The main objective in his presentation was to shed light on the obvious asymmetry of EU foreign policy in the Mediterranean and the Gulf. In his lecture he referred to various EU foreign policy documents in order to stress the Mediterranean’s and the Gulf region’s political and strategic importance for the EU. Based on those foreign policy initiatives the EU aims at supporting reform dynamics in both regions in order to foster the rule of law, the promotion of human rights, and eventually the furtherance of democratic reform. However, Demmelhuber stressed, this is only one side of the coin: the latter objectives are challenged by a striking prime objective to boost the security cooperation with incumbent authoritarian regimes and to stabilize the region. This EU agenda in the Southern Mediterranean stems from a huge socioeconomic gap that acts as a trigger for illegal migration and further security risks (e.g. terrorism and drug trafficking). Demmelhuber tackled the output in reality and concluded that despite many setbacks and inconsistencies, EU/ Mediterranean relations have led to some accomplishments in particular with regards to economic issues. At the same time, Demmelhuber argued, the EU’s record vis-à-vis the authoritarian regimes in the Southern Mediterranean is shaped by a cautious approach and remains a “zero-sum game”.

 

In the Gulf, according to Demmelhuber, there is a much more limited EU foreign policy approach despite a comprehensive package of trade and security interests. Negotiations for a free trade agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have been suspended in December 2008 after more than one decade of negotiations. Demmelhuber asked the question: Is it only the factor “oil” that makes the normative agenda towards the Gulf region less absolute? He argued that the EU faces political, economic, and social settings in the Gulf that are simply not conducive for the effective deployment of standard EU forms of cooperation. On both sides the lack of sufficient institutional capacity, the supremacy of geo-economic issues, the retaining strong bilateral ties of some EU member states, and the lack of political will in particular on behalf of the EU are responsible for the low profile of EU foreign policy in the region. Demmelhuber concluded by saying: “I even dare argue that the EU is now paying the price for the decades-long neglect. It does not show the flexibility to come up with an alternative foreign policy concept that might work vis-à-vis the Gulf.”

 

After his 40 minutes talk the floor was opened for the Q & A section with much of the questions and comments revolving around the reasons for the neglect of the Gulf in the EU foreign policy. Whereas some asked about any possible blueprint for EU/ GCC relations arising from EU’s foreign policy in other regions, others stressed the necessity to be a bit more patient. The EU has only recently started to embark on a more active role in the region, so one should give both sides more time.


Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Mar 26 , 2009
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

05 Mar India as a Strategic Factor in 21st Century Geopolitics

Details:

India - one of Asia’s vibrant democratic states is poised at a great moment of her history. India’s soft power advantage especially her huge service-oriented human resources are increasingly reshaping her destiny in the global political economy. Simultaneously, India’s hard power posturing by acquiring nuclear weapons is gradually increasing her stake in global power configuration.


Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Mar 05 , 2008
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

12 Feb Globalization and the Changing National Security State

Details:

The lecture addressed the fate of national security states in light of globalization. The nature of economic globalization was analyzed and the effect of globalization on national security states and relations between such states was discussed for various classes of national security states. It was concluded that there is little evidence that globalization has transformed national security states significantly. They still constitute the primary form of organization and are the principal means of interaction. Some global effects and entities were noted but the current situation is that national security states are alive and well.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Feb 12 , 2008
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

18 Nov Arab Economies in a Changing World

Details:

Filling a major gap in the Middle Eastern literature the book provides a comprehensive examination of the political and economic issues in the Arab world with a rigorous analysis of the data for the region.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Nov 18 , 2007
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

01 Jul Economic Instruments, Legislations, and Environmental Policies in the GCC

Details:

The purpose of this lecture presentation (to be followed by a discussion) is to illustrate the important role of market-based instruments or economic instruments in tackling different environmental problems. As a means of achieving environmental management objectives, non-economic regulatory measures have been adopted worldwide as well as in the Gulf region. Economic instruments are now being increasingly implemented in many countries, both developed and developing. The use of economic instruments should be of some relevance to GCC environmental policies at present as these countries are proceeding with economic restructuring, diversification, liberalization and privatization.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Jul 01 , 2007
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

04 Dec International Norms versus Local Realities: Why International Law Matters

Details:

Dr Aryeh Neier, President, Open Society Institute, New York, will deliver a lecture on “International Norms versus Local Realities: Why International Law Matters” and discuss issues related to the rule of law in areas that have relevance to the Middle East. A roundtable thereafter will address matters such as crimes of war (on which a publication was prepared a few years ago) and prisoners of war.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Dec 04 , 2006
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

23 May Oil for Gold or Oil for Paper? Financial Stability, Gold and the ongoing Rise in Commodity Prices

Details:

Whether currencies, oil or offshore investments, every crucial economic factor in the Gulf countries is highly dependent on the US dollar, which shows increasing signs of structural weakness. In his lecture, Dr. Lips, a worldwide renowned gold and currency expert, will discuss how the Gulf countries can escape potential financial disaster and how they could act in the current economic environment. Dr. Lips will also look at how the Gulf countries can preserve their investment capacities most effectively given that the ongoing boom in oil and commodity prices is reminiscent of the stagflation scenario of the seventies. In that respect, he will pay special attention to the huge supply deficit in the gold sector and the efforts that have been undertaken to address this problem.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : May 23 , 2005
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

15 Dec Role of the Arab Research Centers During the Current Developments by Prof. Ali Eldean Hilal

Details:

Gulf Research Center will host a lecture entitled Role of the Arab Research Centers During the Current Developments

by Prof. Ali Eldean Hilal


Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Dec 15 , 2004
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

14 Dec The Implications of Arafat’s Death for Palestinian Politics and the Peace Process

Details:

The death of Yaser Arafat on November 11, 2004, after 35 years as Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and 10 years as President of the Palestinian Authority (PA), was widely heralded in the international community as providing an opportunity to resume the Middle East peace process. However, a careful look beyond the facile public statements issued by various capitals and leaders, not least US President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, reveals that there has been little change in the objectives, strategies, and incentive structures for any of the relevant actors. In fact, it indicates that the leading members of the international community are not reconsidering their approach to conflict resolution in the Palestinian-Israeli context in any meaningful way, and are not about to introduce significant alterations in their policies in the foreseeable future.

There is indeed a window of opportunity for positive change in Palestinian politics on both the domestic and external fronts, but this is likely to pass unfulfilled and eventually lead to even greater domestic strife if it is not matched by a similar shift on the Israeli side. Such a shift appears exceedingly unlikely. Indeed, all indications are that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, parties of the Israeli nationalist-religious Right, and the powerful settler lobby see an opportunity of a very different type: to extend even further and legitimize the colonization of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, while deferring for at least a decade, if not permanently, discussion, let alone resolution, of the status of East Jerusalem and the rights of Palestinian refugees.

This deeply worrying prospect is reinforced by the uncritical support provided to the Government of Israel (GoI) by the US Administration, which has ushered in a sea-change in the US position on the political, legal, and territorial issues of the conflict since the advent of Bush. Recent statements by the US president suggest an intention to base US diplomacy in the Middle East peace process on precisely the preceding scenario, long promoted by Sharon. Indeed, no less a cause for pessimism is that US support for Palestinian statehood – which, ironically, was made a formal objective of US policy for the first time ever by the Bush administration and endorsed at its initiative in UN Security Council Resolution 1397 in March 2002 – reverted almost immediately to being something contingent, rather than a matter of principle. Instead, exercise of the Palestinian right to national self-determination, long recognized by virtually the entire international community, and formally called for by the EU since its Berlin summit statement of March 25 1999, is now conditional on the badly-battered and discredited PA’s performance and its compliance with certain provisions set in Bush’s speech of June 24, 2002, and adopted in the Quartet’s ‘Roadmap’ to peace published in May 2003. The transformation of this Palestinian right into something conditional and provisional has therefore been accepted in effect by the three other Quartet members – the EU, UN, and Russia – representing a distinct regression for the Palestinians and ultimately for hopes of a durable peace.

 The central argument of this talk, therefore, is that the most likely prospect for Israel and Palestine is a continuing situation of no-peace on a long-term basis, with attendant violence of varying form and intensity. This is not least because all indications are that the international community is, and will remain, unwilling to undertake interventions of a scope and scale that might alter the underlying disintegrative dynamics and negative incentive structure of the conflict, the present opportunity notwithstanding. In turn, this unwillingness has all to do with the general reluctance of the remaining international and regional players to take their discomfort with Israeli policy to the point of affirmative action, precisely because this would require a willingness to confront this aspect of the US Administration’s Middle East policy or at least diverge from it openly. Yet it appears that without marking a distinct, and if necessary divergent, course of action, the administration’s three co-sponsors of the Quartet’s ‘Roadmap’ – the EU, UN, and Russia – have little credible hope of exerting meaningful pressure on their US partner or consequently of leading to substantive change in US policy.

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Dec 14 , 2004
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

28 Sep Nato looking for partners in the Middle East

Details:

The Gulf Research Center had the pleasure of hosting Nato Deputy Secretary-General Alessandro Minuto Rizzo who lectured on Nato looking for partners in the Middle East

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Sep 28 , 2004
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

03 Apr A New Balance of Power in the Middle East‎

Details:

The Board of the German Business Council Dubai in partnership with the
Gulf Research Center, Dubai, had the pleasure to introduce Prof. Dr. Peter Scholl-Latourwho lectured on "A New Balance of Power in the Middle East

Place : Godolphin Ballroom, Emirates Towers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Apr 03 , 2004
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

01 Mar The Future of the Enlarged European Union

Details:

Professor Weidenfeld Director of the Center for Applied Policy Research (C·A·P), Munich and the Member of the Executive Board of the Bertelsmann Foundation conducted round table discussion "The Future of the enlarged European Union and its neighborhood"

Place : GRC Conference Room, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Mar 01 , 2004
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

22 Oct The New Economic situation in the region post Iraq war

Details:

Lecture and Discussion "The New Economic situation in the region post Iraq war and

European Union role in the region."

In forecasting a bleak demographic character of Europe -- which is likely to see its next generation reduce by half, consequently shrinking its labor force and hurting the economy as well, the Deutsche Bank chief economist identified one crucial and viable area of cooperation with the Middle East. Since the region boasts of an abundant human resource base, Europe and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) could work towards demographic compatibility. EU enlargement by roping in Eastern European countries is no solution for the future demographic imbalance; apart from being the hub of energy suppliers, the Middle East has demographic strength too.

 

Wednesday, 22th October 2003
7:30 PM Dubai World Trade Center 33rd Floor

Place : Dubai World Trade Centre ,Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Oct 22 , 2003
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture
  

20 Oct The Arab Gulf and International Relations Past, Present and Future

Details:

Lecture and discussion "The Arab Gulf and International Relations: Past, Present and Future" 

Based on the premise that dialogue is the essence of life, Professor Fred Halliday suggested that the future of the Arabian Gulf would depend on the way the evolving politico-socio-economic changes are managed. The long-term challenge in the region, in his opinion, is to ensure a working relationship between the Arab Gulf countries and Iran , and especially between the three big regional players Saudi Arabia , Iran and Iraq .

He also suggested that conflicts in the region are not based on historical struggles as much as being rooted in nationalism the Iran-Iraq struggle was essentially a result of a clash between anti-Persian and anti-Arab sentiments...

 

Monday, 20th October 2003
6:30 PM Dubai Chamber of Commerce

Place : Dubai Chamber of Commerce, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Date : Oct 20 , 2003
Category: Past Events
Event Type : Lecture

Search Events