Circular economy (CE) is
recognized globally as a new model of economic development based on more
efficient utilization of resources across the production and consumption value
chain (Rizos et al., 2017). It is a zero-waste approach, meant to extend the
lifespan and economic value of resources as well as support sustainable growth
by redirecting used resources into new income streams (Acharya, Boyd, and
Finch, 2018). Essentially, it is an economic model that is applicable across
supply chains and sectors, and that maps out the process of product and service
design, manufacturing, and consumption with an aim to minimize the
environmental impact as well as open doors to underexplored markets (Acharya, Boyd, and
Finch, 2018).
The transition towards the CE has the potential to change the market landscape either globally and/or locally. When implementing CE, consumption will decrease, products are refurbished or recycled, higher quality products are designed to be long-lasting, easy-to-repair, as well as offered to the market as a service rather an item to be owned where applicable. Furthermore, the global market should have to accept policies that might encourage the import of materials, resources and products that comply with CE practices. Regions and countries will ultimately achieve a higher material self-efficiency with design for the environment (DfE) products as the number of materials recycled increases within their borders.
In addition, CE to a greater extent will promote recycling within regional or national borders, whereby waste can be traded and recycled elsewhere, especially when certain recycling technologies are not available. Recyclable waste could be sent to countries with staffed facilities that employ high-quality recycling practices and uphold acceptable environmental standards.
Implementation of integrated approaches in
infrastructure planning can steer the substantial economic and environmental
benefits in terms of resource savings and waste reduction. Various programs and initiatives have been
launched by various stakeholders worldwide either government, businesses,
non-governmental organizations, etc. as listed below:
1) Slovenian city of Maribor’s “Urban Soil for
Food” project – Increase the city’s food self-efficiency, promote CE, reduce
carbon footprint, and re-connect citizens with nature.
2) Japan’s “Regional Circulating and Ecological
Spheres (R-CES)” Concept – Locally available resources are utilized in a
sustainable manner, circulated locally, and exchanged with neighboring regions
according to the region’s unique features.
3) Germany’s multi-stakeholder initiative,
“PREVENT Waste Alliance” – Reduce waste pollution in low-and middle-income
countries through development of functional waste management and CE approaches.
4) Indonesia’s “National Plastic Action
Partnership (NPAP)” – Convene Indonesia’s leading stakeholders as well as influencers
who can manipulate necessary influence to drive public-private actions to shape
a new plastics economy at the national and local levels.
5) Costa Rica’s Plastic Process Engineering
Company – Convert plastic waste into highly durable, excellent quality and
usable plastic products for industrial, construction, architecture, and design
application.
6) Netherlands’s The Recycle Studio (TRS) –
Share knowledge on how to begin personal recycling workshops wherever a person
may be in the world.
7) European Union’s Sustainable Products Initiative (SPI) – Key milestone to sustainable resource use by mobilizing dedicated sector-specific legislation including complementary social considerations on product requirements (IGES, 2021).
GCC countries have initiated an
economic transition away from hydro-carbon-led economic growth to diversify
their economy away from oil dependency and toward a more sustainable economic model
that simultaneously addresses environmental challenges throughout the region. The
transition to a circular economy has been driven also by an ambition to achieve
greater efficiency, create new jobs, and attract green investment (PwC, 2021
[1]). GCC countries are in the ideal position to pioneer the rise of a circular
economy as they are already global leaders in the energy, utilities and
resources sector. As energy demands rise on a global scale, GCC countries are
interested in continuing to answer the call, yet they are desperate to find
ways to do so innovatively. The nature of the industry that fuels the GCC
economically, is such that it contributes significantly to global emissions
with Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia ranking among the top 10
countries with the highest emissions levels in the world. Therefore, a shift
toward more environmentally responsible policies and practices not only ensures
a brighter future for the citizens of these countries but also points toward
the development of a more sustainable economic future as well. The GCC countries
are at various stages of exploring the development of new circular sectors and
activities such as waste management, maintenance, repair, remanufacturing as
well as advanced recycling processes with the aim of encouraging
green economies, resource efficiency, and renewable energy strategies across
the region.
The GCC countries have made every effort to escalate the economic diversification process to proceed away from hydrocarbon dependent sectors. Potentially, circular economy will be able to support economic diversification as well as development of new industrial and service-led activities in the GCC countries, for instance by advanced recycling processes, production of bio-based products and product as service models. The CE can promote the sustainable use of the key resources of water and land as well as reduce the large footprints of consumption and production. Water overuse and scarcity along with the scarcity of arable land for agriculture have been major concerns in the GCC region resulting in outstanding priorities for sustainable agriculture, water use efficiency, and integrated water management (Brown et al., 2018). Water scarcity and increased water demands have been overcome by desalination plants, organized with governing by-laws and objectives in the water sector throughout the region (Moossa et al. 2022). Additionally, the GCC region also recorded high levels of energy intensity, emissions footprints, and air pollution because of fuel burning and construction. The GCC countries have initiated programs to reduce excessive consumption of resources along with increased recycling (Beijani, et al., 2019) as they have realized the limits of the conventional linear economic model and its rapid resource depletion yielding unprecedented waste and emissions (Al-Alawi et al., 2020).
THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE GCC REGION
Over the past decades, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region has experienced rapid economic development and population growth. While this has been an important transformation for the region, it has resulted in accelerating the depletion of its resources and generating unprecedented amounts of waste and emissions. The unintended side effect of this has been detrimental to the region’s environment and has presented new challenges within the economy and society at large, placing pressure on GCC leaders to address the prevalent linear economic model, based on “take, make, and discard.”
The GCC population reached 58.86 million in 2022 (worldpopulationreview.com) with 84 percent of the population living in urban areas. Given the population density, current consumption patterns in the region are unsustainable both on the domestic and the business level. According to the Global Footprint Network, the average global ecological footprint is 1.7 global hectares which is approximately five times less than the lowest ecological footprint in some GCC countries (Global Footprint Network, 2016).
The transportation,
construction, and industry sectors contribute 30 percent of GHG emissions
worldwide (IPCC, 2014, p.745), so developing a green strategy there should be
top priority for the GCC region. Whereas the production and use of these
industry products and materials are damaging to the environment, the amount of
waste that is produced by them is further troublesome. Material waste from
products like cars, machines, and plastics do not decompose and take up
significant portions of global landfills, continuing their damage long after
their use is done. Companies in these industries would benefit greatly from
adopting a circular model of development and practice. This is indeed becoming
more and more crucial as consumers are becoming more cognizant of the
environmental footprint that they and the products they purchase leave behind.
Brands that can be labeled as ‘green’ tend to be well received, and in a CE
model, their products would be deemed more valuable. So, in addition to perhaps
complying with environmental regulations toward climate change and
environmental crises, companies who follow CE practices could see remarkable
gains in their profits and brand reputation as well. (Karagualian et al, 2015).
The application of resource
efficiency in the industrial sector following the CE model would mean recycling
and remanufacturing as well as reusing or redirecting industrial waste to serve
new purposes. Eventually this cycle could reduce the GHG emissions altogether,
with a lesser number of raw materials needed for production (OECD, 2018, p. 3).
One of the biggest contributors to environmental degradation has been the ever-growing
masses of plastic waste in our oceans and landfills. The process of plastics
disposal is particularly troublesome in achieving a CE due to the difficulty in
recycling it, the effects of its disposal, and the longevity of its mechanical
composition. As of now, plastic production, use and disposal has followed a
linear economic model—whereby it is developed for single use and discarded in
landfills. Only 5 percent of plastics that are labeled as “recyclable” are reprocessed
into something else. There are many different types of plastics that cannot be
mixed, and they do not readily decompose. Furthermore, the process of recycling
most plastics involves breaking them down, melting, and reforming, which
weakens the material, making it less durable. The process can also not be
repeated indefinitely, as the chemical composition of the plastic loses its
integrity and eventually becomes useless. The process of incinerating plastic
waste is both costly and gives off its own damaging environmental effects. In
the CE model, the answer to plastic lies in the repurpose, reuse, or refill
options. The need to reduce the amount of energy and natural resources used in
the production and disposal of plastics is something that scientists are still
working on, but the fact of the matter is that as plastic waste piles up, we
face detrimental environmental consequences.
Plastic recycling will require more complex technology, but it is vital
to find a way to make plastic waste disposal more sustainable, requiring lower
amounts of energy and natural resources (Zafar, 2020).
In 2010, the UAE launched a
national plan called UAE National Agenda and Vision. It mapped out six focus
areas including “sustainable environment and infrastructure” which prioritized
air quality, water availability, clean energy, and green growth plans. Some of
the National Agenda’s achievements are a better scarcity index (ratio of 2.16),
air quality index (91.4 percent), and share of clean energy contribution (19.63
percent). Additionally, the National Committee on Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) was set up in January 2017 to oversee the implementation and alignment
of its own national goals and the 17 Global Goals put forth by the UN in 2015.
UAE’s National Committee on SDGs serves the main purpose of facilitating,
monitoring, and reporting progress toward SDG targets.
In January 2012, the “UAE Green
Growth Strategy,” a long-term national initiative, was laid out emphasizing the
country’s need to build a greener economy, through sustainable development and
developing green products and technologies that could make the UAE a world
leader in green exports (Howarth et al., 2020). This initiative was followed in
January 2015 by the UAE Green Agenda 2015-2030 in collaboration with the Global
Green Growth Institute (GGGI) and focused on five strategic objectives:
competitive knowledge-economy; social development and quality of life; sustainable
environment and valued natural resources; clean energy and climate action;
green life and sustainable use of resources.
Moreover, the Ministry of
Climate Change & Environment (MoCCAE) created the UAE National Sustainable
Consumption and Production Plan (2019 – 2030) to spur the shift to a circular
economy at the federal level. The primary goals of the plan are to achieve sustainable
management and efficient use of natural resources by bolstering the shift to a
CE, encouraging the private sector to initiate cleaner production, consumption,
and disposal methods that can help to alleviate environmental stress and fulfill
basic needs (UAE
National Sustainable Production & Consumption Plan [2019-2030] Framework).
The
UAE government executed a high-level commitment to CE with the launching of the
Circular Economy Council and introduced the UAE Circular Economy Policy in
2021. The council set numerous goals such as to coordinate federal and local
strategies under the policy’s requirements, boost the involvement of the
private sector in projects and initiatives related to the CE, as well as foster
collaboration between the public and private sectors. Amongst members of the council
that is chaired by the Minister of Climate Change and Environment, Her
Excellency Mariam bint Mohammed Almheiri, are the MoCCAE, the Environment
Agency - Abu Dhabi (EAD), Abu Dhabi Waste Management Center (Tadweer), Dubai
Municipality, Municipality and Planning Department in Ajman, Emirates Nature –
WWF, and the World Economic Forum (UAE’s Circular Economy Council). The Circular
Economy Policy initiative is expected to accomplish the UAE’s vision of becoming
a global pioneer of green development
through priority sectors such as infrastructure, sustainable transportation,
sustainable manufacturing, and sustainable food production and consumption.
Additional benefits to the CE policy include generating economic gains for the
country, stimulating economic growth, increasing competitiveness, and creating
job opportunities.
The journey to a circular
economy in Saudi Arabia started when the government announced its Vision 2030
in 2016 as a strategic framework for the nation’s future growth model. The Vision
was intentionally drafted to reduce oil dependence, diversify the economy,
enhance competitiveness, create jobs, attract tourism, and strengthen the
private sector, as well as boost
investment in the sectors that have the most growth potential such as renewable
energy, waste management, green cities, etc. Vision 2030 sets 96 strategic
objectives across 11 Vision Realization Programs that will support the
transition to a CE including assuring the sustainability of vital resources, enhancing
the efficiency of waste management, minimizing
consumption, and utilizing treated and renewable water (EU-GCC Dialogue,
2020b).
The King Abdullah Petroleum
Studies and Research Centre (KAPSARC) highlighted that the green growth options
under the 2030 Vision emphasize the circular carbon economy (CCE) through the
recycling of carbon-by-products as a reasonable (pragmatic) measure to address
CO2 emissions issues (Howarth et al., 2020; Williams, 2019). CCE can play an
analytical, voluntary, and complementary role in helping countries to achieve
international and domestic sustainability development goals, in conjunction
with national economic development strategies. In other words, shifting toward
an environmentally friendly economic model does not have to come at the expense
of economic development. Furthermore,
the CCE’s ‘4Rs’ in reference to ‘reduce, reuse, recycle, and remove’ can enable
a holistic and complementary approach that countries can use to manage
emissions as well as apply to other key areas, for example, material resource
efficiency (G20 Climate Stewardship Working Group, 2020).
Another
important strategy that promotes the advancement toward a circular economy in Saudi
Arabia is the National Waste Management Strategy under the auspices of the Strategic
Waste Management Master Plan that was introduced in 2021. This strategy outlined
a strategic direction for solid waste management along with a recommendation on
a series of interventions to revise the technical, financial, and environmental
performance of waste operation, aligning it with good international practice. The
strategy is also intended to improve the management of municipal solid waste
(MSW), diverting much of it out of the Kingdom’s brimming landfills, sorting and
repurposing it via waste-to-energy plants. These measures would contribute
significantly to the advancement toward a circular economy through recycling
(42 percent), compost (35 percent), incineration (19 percent) and an 82 percent
diversion rate from landfills by 2030, as well as create new business and job opportunities
in waste management, green investment, environmental auditing and
accreditation, sustainability consultancy etc. (Zafar, 2018 in Al-Alawi et al.,
2020).
Qatar made a significant
commitment to take on climate change through an endorsement of the Basel
Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes
(1995), UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1996), the Paris Agreement
(2016), and the National Climate Change Plan (September 2021). Additionally,
Qatar engaged with regional and international partners to initiate platforms
for climate change cooperation, discussion, and action as a means to achieve a
circular economy (Qatar’s Circular Economy Policy Paper).
The Qatar National Vision 2030
(QNV2030) was designed to promote sustainable development in Qatar through
economic growth, social and human development, and environmental management by
2030. Circular economy in Qatar has been driven by QNV2030 with an intention to
harmonize economic development with environmental protection, the utmost ambition
of the circular model. The elements of
CE can be definitively outlined across all pillars of the vision, particularly
in pillar three as well as pillar four (environmental development). Figure 1
highlights some of the ongoing sustainability projects with stewardship from
QNV2030, reflecting the government’s commitment to promoting a circular economy
and sustainability in Qatar. The ongoing sustainability programs are listed
below:
·
Qatar
developed the first smart downtown district in the world, Msheireb Downtown
Doha.
·
Qatar
National Bank issued the first green bond from Qatar, as well as the largest
green bond issued by a financial institution in the MENA region in 2020.
·
Qatar
has the fifth highest number of LEED-certified buildings outside the USA,
located in Lusail and Msheireb.
·
Green
transportation targets were set in place to transition 25 percent of its public
transit bus fleet from gasoline to electric in 2022 and to 100 percent by 2030.
Over 400 electric vehicle charging stations were put in place by 2022.
Additionally, 10 percent of all vehicle sales are targeted to be in electric
vehicles by 2030.
·
District
cooling technology accounts for 17 percent of total air conditioning demand in
the nation.
·
Hamad
Port is the largest eco-friendly project in the MENA region, as well as one of
largest green ports in the world.
·
Qatar
Energy’s sustainability project has a target to capture more than 7Mtpa of CO2
in the country.
The green aspirations of
QNV2030 were given extended support through the Second National Development Strategy
(2018 – 2022). Aimed at sustainable consumption and production (SCP), most of
the program’s goals were realized by the end of 2022. There was a reduction in the per capita consumption of
water by 15 percent through the national program “Tarshid,” acceleration of
recycled materials used in construction projects to 20 percent of total
materials used (United Nations, 2018), and a reduction of the per capita
electricity consumption rate by 8 percent, along with the expansion of the
recycling rate of solid waste to 15 percent (Planning Statistics Authority
Qatar, 2019). Additional outcomes of 2nd NDS are clean air and
effective climate change responses – elimination of excess ozone levels through
improved air quality management and halved gas flaring from 0.0230 to 0.007
billion cubic meters per million tons of energy produced; reduced waste, more
recycling and more efficient use of recyclable products; establishment of a solid waste management
plan which can increase the recycling rate of solid waste from 8 to 38 percent; domestic waste generation at 1.6 kilograms
per capita per day; nature and natural heritage conserved, protected and
sustainably managed; establishment of a comprehensive electronic biodiversity
database and expansion of actively managed protected areas; more sustainable
urbanization and a healthier living environment through the development of 3
shady green space corridors, as well as a system put in place to monitor their
effect on health and air quality in urban areas; promotion of sustainable
infrastructure by Qatar Foundation; and increase in the environmental awareness
among Qataris and its residents (Qatar 2nd NDS, 2018 – 2022).
Qatar also launched
Qatar’s National Vision 2030 as a strategic plan to develop Qatar into an advanced
society capable of sustaining its development and providing a high standard of
living for its people. This National Vision highlighted 5 major challenges that
Qatar will face –
1. modernization and preservation
of traditions
2. needs of the current generation
and of future generations
3. management of economic growth, management
of uncontrollable expansion
4. size and quality of the
expatriate labor force and the selection of path of development
5. economic growth, social development, and environmental management (Qatar Government Communication Office, 2023).
Figure 1: Initiatives Taken by Qatar to Develop a Circular Economy
Source: Qatar’s Sustainable Economic Transition, August 2022
Oman’s initiative to promote
circular economy and thus a sustainable economy, is well articulated in its
Vision 2040 and Oman Energy Master Plan 2040. These documents strategize the
Omanis’ efforts to achieve a sustainable economy as well as to restructure their
economic model. The aim of Oman Energy Master Plan 2040 is to address the
domestic energy demand especially on natural gas resources, long-term strategy
on renewable energies, promotion of energy efficiency and improvement in
demand-side management on an individual as well as industrial level (Gulf
Intelligence Consultancy, 2017). Additionally, both documents also promote a
circular economy in line with the needs of its people and consistent with the domestic
climate change adaptation strategy as well as United Nations – Sustainable
Development Goals (UN-SDGs)(Al-Alawi, B. et al., 2020).
Oman’s Vision 2040 was
introduced to provide strategic guidance in creating a sustainable economic model.
The Vision outlines ways for Oman to move away from the oil-based industry into
other service sectors such as tourism (Azar, E., and Abdel Raouf, M., 2018). In
addition to the Vision 2040, the government also initiated Oman’s National
Energy Strategy 2040 with the objective of driving various efforts to implement
circular economy. It is the government’s response to the national need for
sustainability, coupled with its commitment to adhering to and complying with
climate change action at the global level (El-Katiri et al., 2019).
Additionally, Oman Vision 2040
has 4 pillars – a society of creative individuals, a competitive economy,
responsible state agencies and an environment with sustainable development. Under
the pillar of an environment with sustainable components, the Omani government
has specific objectives that it aims to achieve which are a green and circular
economy that addresses national needs and moves consistently with global
trends, an environment that ensures the balance between environmental, economic
and social requirements in line with the sustainable development guidelines,
sustainable use of and investment in natural resources as well as wealth to
deliver high added value, renewable energy, diversified sources of energy and
rationalized consumption to achieve energy security, etc. (Oman Vision 2040 –
Implementation Follow-Up Unit).
Furthermore, Royal Decree no.
46/2009 accepted Bee’ah (Oman Environmental Services Holding Company) in 2009
as a legal entity responsible for managing solid waste in the country. The
establishment of Bee’ah as the authority over proper waste management was aimed
at producing more sustainable waste management practices as well as to govern
the necessary infrastructure, waste collection points and promotion of public
awareness about the importance of environmentally sustainable disposal
practices throughout the Sultanate (Bee’ah, 2017). While Bee’ah manages the
waste, the Al Amerat Landfill project focuses on the use of an environmentally friendly
method to process the solid waste. As the population of Oman has grown rapidly,
the country has produced increasing amounts of solid waste each year. To combat
this, the government initiated the Al Amerat sanitary landfill, which processes
solid waste in a scientific and environmentally friendly way, with better engineered landfills, waste
transfer stations, and waste treatment
plants which will provide the blueprint for all future solid waste management
projects across Oman (Zafar, S., 2018).
The Bahrain’s Economic Vision
2030 which was launched in October 2008 by His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al
Khalifa is a comprehensive economic vision for Bahrain with provisions of explicit
direction for the continued development of the Bahraini economy as well as a
shared objective of building a better life for every Bahraini. This vision
concentrates on shaping the vision of the government, society and the economy
based on 3 guiding principles – sustainability, fairness, and competitiveness –
as well as addresses the Bahraini’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030.
As an example, under the sustainability guiding principle, the private sector
should be able to drive Bahrain’s economic growth independently and its
economic prosperity should be built on a firm foundation (bahrain.bh, 2021).
One of the public-private partnerships that is highlighted in this vision is
Tabreed Bahrain that provides environmentally friendly district cooling solutions
to support the regional energy sustainability strategy. Tabreed Bahrain provides
district cooling services operated by a 22,800 RT plant using sea water and
running a 14-kilometer chilled water distribution network across major developments
including Bahrain Financial Harbor, Bahrain World Trade Center, the Reef Island
and Avenues Mall (tabreedbahrain.com).
Bahrain has significantly
invested in the offshore financial sector to promote available financial
services to non-residents. This helps in circumventing aspects of the
non-resident’s home country or jurisdiction in the country’s strategy of strengthening
their economic resilience in the GCC region. These efforts will promote shariah
financing, conventional, and green financing options for potential green
investments that will drive Bahrain’s green economy in the future. The Supreme
Council for Environment (SCE) of the Kingdom of Bahrain began collaborating
with the Ministry of Industry, Commerce, and Tourism to develop policies and
regulations that align with sustainable alternatives to current practices
(UNEP, 2019).
Up until the 26th United Nations
Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP 26) in Glasgow, held from October
31 to November 13, 2021, Bahrain had addressed CO2e emissions reductions
implicitly within its existing energy targets that were set in 2017. The National
Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP) 2017 sets a national renewable energy
target of 5 percent renewable energy by 2025 and boosted to 10 percent by 2035
with a proposed renewable energy mix consisting of solar, wind and waste-to-energy
technologies (SEA, 2021). From the carbon governance perspective, Bahrain has ambitiously
set a national target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060, with an interim
goal of a 30% reduction in CO2e emissions by 2035. Bahrain’s commitment to
achieving a clean environment and a more sustainable economy are spearheaded by
the programs and initiatives outlined in policies such as the NREAP and its
Vision 2030. The goal is to shift gradually to green energy procurement,
sustainable finance mechanisms, and environmentally oriented corporate social
responsibility programs for companies throughout the Kingdom. This calls for
cooperation from the Kingdom’s industrial sectors such as transportation,
construction, and power generation especially, but also with the public at
large in adopting a more sustainable lifestyle (Alsabbagh, M. and Alnaser, W.E.,
2022). In 2022, Bahrain doubled down on its commitment to environmental
sustainability by issuing a ministerial order to prohibit the use of single-use
plastic bags at supermarkets and malls and is moving aggressively toward the
development of solar parks and wind energy plants to supplement the Kingdom’s
energy needs.
Kuwait created “Kuwait’s Vision
– The Year 2035” in 2020 with the main objective of developing a more
sustainable economy for Kuwait (Azar, E., and Abdel Raouf, M., 2018) with one of
its seven pillars dedicated to promoting a sustainable living environment for
Kuwaiti society (El-Katiri et al., 2019). To stimulate the use of domestic
renewable energy at an average 9 percent, Kuwait has increased the wind
capacity generation through Shagaya Wind Plant (Beijani et al., 2019).
Furthermore, Kuwait implemented
policies and regulations to trigger urban planning and design along with
construction practices that adopt the circular economy principles. This has
been done through the review of existing urban development policies and
regulations, implementation of urban regeneration policies for better assets
optimization and improvement in urban planning accessibility, with an aim to
minimize traffic volume as well as pollution. Finally, Kuwait has developed a
downstream oil industrial city to accommodate a mix of energy-related
industries to integrate upstream and downstream hydrocarbon activity (Callen et
al., 2014).
Table 1 below highlights various
visions and strategies introduced by GCC countries with stipulated objectives
to promote the circular economy through sustainability.
Table 1: GCC Initiatives Towards
Sustainable Economy
Country |
Vision and Strategies |
Aims and
Objectives |
UAE |
UAE Vision 2021 Green Economy Abu Dhabi Vision 2030 |
The policies and strategies have
objectives toward various sustainable strategies on both economic and
resource levels, to develop UAE’s resiliency and promotion of economic
diversification. |
Qatar |
Qatar National Vision 2030 |
Qatar’s blueprint to enable them to
achieve sustainable development by 2030 through economic, social, human and
environmental development. |
Oman |
Oman’s Vision 2040 |
Oman’s vision to develop a sustainable
economy less dependent on the oil sector. |
Bahrain |
The Economic Vision |
A comprehensive approach to develop
Bahrain in the right direction for the betterment of Bahrainis. |
Saudi Arabia |
Saudi Vision 2030 |
The Saudi vision has a strong target to
progress into a more sustainable economy away from the current oil-based
economy. |
Kuwait |
Kuwait’s Vision: The Year 2035 |
The Kuwait vision to promote and set up a
sustainable economy in the country. |
Source: Al-Alawi, B., Cavallari, G. et al, 2020
The various national policies
established by some GCC nations to stimulate circularity in their four (4) main
sectors: oil and gas, chemical, power and utilities and metal and mining are outlined
in Table 2 below.
Table 2: National Policy to Promote
Circularity in FOUR (4) Main Sectors in Selected GCC Countries
GCC Country |
National
Policy |
Qatar |
2018 - Qatar National Vision 2030 integrates the goals
and objectives of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development into
sections of the National Development Strategy (2018-2022). |
United Arab Emirates |
2010 - UAE Vision 2021 includes policies to support a transition
towards a more circular economy. 2015 - UAE’s National Sustainable Production &
Consumption plan (2019-2030) sets out a framework for supporting the
transition to a circular economy and identifies oil and gas as a priority
sector. 2017 - The UAE National Energy Plan 2050 sets out plans
to cut CO2 emissions by 70% and increase renewable energy and nuclear
capacity by 50% by 2050. 2017 - The UAE’s Water Security Strategy 2036 aims to
reduce potable water consumption by 20% and increase reuse of treated water
to 95% by 2036. 2019 - The Coalition of Innovation in Recycling towards
a Closed Loop Economy (the Coalition Circle) signs a pledge with the Ministry
of Climate Change and the Environment to develop a circular economy model in
the UAE. 2020 - Abu Dhabi’s Environment Agency publishes a Single
Use Plastic Policy, which articulates a long-term ambition to transition
towards circularity practices with the possibility for nationwide ban
implementation. 2021 - The Abu Dhabi Department of Energy launches its
Policy for Energy Production from Waste to support Abu Dhabi’s transition
towards a more sustainable economy and highlight the circular economy’s role. |
Saudi Arabia |
2020 - Saudi Arabia launches the concept of a circular
carbon economy during its presidency of the G20. |
Oman |
2021 - Oman Environmental Service Holding Company will
regulate 11 waste streams to support the transition to a circular economy. |
Source:
(1), (2), and (3) PwC, 2021.
In addition to the government’s
visions, strategies, and national policies there are numerous initiatives
explicitly aimed at the transition to a circular economy, such as renewable
resources, maximizing the product life cycle, by-product recovery, and waste management
that have been practiced by both government-linked and private companies. Table
3 highlights the potential of these initiatives to advocate circularity in four
main sectors in the GCC region.
Table 3: Circular Economy Initiatives and Their
Potential to Promote Circularity in FOUR
Main Sectors in GCC Countries
Circular
Economy Initiatives |
Oil
& Gas (Potential)1 |
Chemicals
(Potential)1 |
Power
& Utilities (Potential)2 |
Metals
& Mining (Potential)3 |
Prioritize Renewable Inputs |
Resource Efficiency (Very High)
Circular Sourcing (High) |
Sustainable Design (Very High)
Circular Sourcing (High)
Resource Efficiency (High) |
Circular Sourcing (Very High)
Resource Efficiency (Very High)
Sustainable Design (High) |
Circular Sourcing (High)
Resource Efficiency (High) |
Maximize Product Use |
|
Usage Optimization/ Maintenance (Very High)
Product-as-a-Service (High)
Reuse/Redistribution (High) |
Usage Optimization/ Maintenance (Very High) |
Usage Optimization/ Maintenance (High)
Reuse/Redistribution (High) |
Recover By-Products and Waste Management |
Industrial Symbiosis (Very High)
Recycling from Manufacturing Refurbishing/ Remanufacture (High) |
Recycling from Consumption (Very High)
Refurbishing/Remanufacture (High) Industrial Symbiosis (High)
Recycling from Manufacturing (High) |
Industrial Symbiosis (High)
Recycling from Manufacturing Recycling from Consumption (High) Refurbishing/Remanufacture (Medium) |
Refurbishing/ Remanufacture (High)
Industrial Symbiosis (High) Recycling from Manufacturing
Recycling from Consumption (High) |
Case Study
|
Aramco
Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) |
SABIC
ADNOC Borouge (Joint Venture between ADNOC
and Borealis) |
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority
(DEWA)
Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park,
Dubai |
Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA)
Emirates Steel Arkan |
Source: (1), (2) and (3) PwC, 2021.
Circular economy has been
underpinned indirectly in various Egyptian national policies, for instance,
Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 (SDS2030), the Sustainable and Green Growth
Strategy, National Action Plan for Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP)
as well as the National Solid Waste Management Program (NSWMP). In addition,
the CE activities are indirectly endorsed under the sustainable development
theme as specified under numerous articles such as Article 27 – Economic
System, Article 41 – Housing, Article 46 – Environment and Article 79 – Food of
the Egyptian Constitution of 2014 (Maamoun, N., 2021).
The various national strategies,
plans, initiatives and programs help lay the foundation for practical
implication of CE conducive activities for Egyptian companies. They have been
seen in practice in organizations like Tagaddod for the refinement of cooking
oil (tagaddod.com), Bariq for recycling (http://bariq-eg.com), Switch-MED (capacity
building and training programs on resource savings), Better Cotton Initiative (cotton
agriculture process and sustainable fashion designs), IMKAN Go & IMKAN Grow
(support for 20 innovative startups and seven micro- and small enterprises (MSEs) which is funded by Japan and
jointly implemented with Egypt’s Ministry of Trade and Industry as well as IEE
UNIDO (implementation of ISO 50001 compliant energy management system). The integration
of CE in Egyptian national policies, strategies, and initiatives has the
potential to reap endless economic, environmental, and social benefits.
The circular economy initiative
in Jordan is well-documented in the Sustainable Consumption and Production
National Action Plan (SDG12.1). This document has been developed through
nationally owned multi-stakeholder processes, rooted in Jordan’s focus on ‘green’
economic growth as well as circular economy. The document also outlines the logistics
of the plan, namely, agriculture and food transport, as well as waste
management through selected projects and initiatives (SwitchMed
in Jordan, 2020).
Another vital document that lays
out the agenda for a circular economy and sustainability in Jordan is Vision 2025.
This document stresses the need for reconciliation between government revenues
and expenditures, management of the sustainable use of limited natural
resources such as water and energy, along with issues of food security and
import dependency in accomplishing long-term sustainability goals (Jordan’s
Ministry of Environment, 2016).
Moreover, Jordan’s Sustainable
Consumption and Production Strategy and National Action Plan (SCP – NAP 2016 –
2025) is positioned on a shared national vision promoted through direct
involvement between stakeholders and partners which transcribes into strategic
as well as operational objectives for selected consumption and production to
achieve circular economy agenda goals. Amongst the stakeholders and partners
that team up to implement objectives for the circular economy in Jordan are
various organizations such as the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of
Environment, the Chamber of Industries, small and medium enterprises (SMEs),
civil society, and green financing institutions, as well as international
development agencies. These stakeholders and partners are instrumentally
committed to developing the policy, governance, and legal framework necessary
for this initiative to succeed. The primary focus is on innovation networks and
knowledge platforms for the promotion of best environmental practices and
technologies, in addition to the education and support of sustainability in
three key areas – agriculture and food industry, transportation, and the waste
management sector (Jordan’s Ministry of Environment, 2016).
Lebanon is party to several multi-lateral
environmental treaties, protocols and conventions. Much of their national and sectoral
legislation, policies, and laws have also incorporated various degrees of sustainability
principles. For example, the Environment Protection Law (444/2002) directed at
the protection of environmental resources and air quality control, along with numerous
application decrees such as decree 847/2012 on the environmental compliance of
industrial establishments, decree 8633/2012 on the Fundamentals of
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and decree 167/2017 on economic
incentives for environmental protection. All of these regulations reiterate the
commitment to sustainable consumption and production (SCP) through cleaner
production techniques, opening up the bio-diversity conversation, prevention of
natural resource degradation, environmental monitoring (such as pollution
sources and abatement systems), along with establishing landfill standards and promoting
recycling (Lebanon Voluntary National Review, 2018).
Furthermore, the Ministry of
Environment and Industry developed Lebanon’s Action Plan for Sustainable
Consumption and Production for the Industrial Sector in 2015 in association
with SwitchMed. This action plan intended to adopt the best available
techniques, initiated SCP approaches in policy and institutional frameworks,
exerted life cycle thinking as well as highlighted major economic and social
challenges. In addition, the Ministry of Industry’s Integrated Vision for the Industrial
Sector (2025), Executive Strategy (2016 – 2020), and Operational Plan (2017 –
2018) have integrated the principles of sustainability into their texts. The Executive
Strategy has several operational objectives including the promotion of green
industry to foster good environmental management, along with the SCP principles
in the industrial sector (Lebanon Voluntary National Review, 2018).
Tunisia initiated various plans
to promote circular economy through the Sustainable Consumption and Production
(SCP) approach. Among them are the 10-year framework action plan for the agri-food
sector, the 10-year framework action plan for the tourism sector, and the coordination
mechanism for the Sustainable Consumption and Production – National Action Plan
(SCP-NAP) implementation. The main purposes of these frameworks are to encourage
sustainable practices, along with effective business models in the agri-food
and eco-tourism sectors.
Furthermore, pilot projects were
conducted aimed at demonstrating the necessary measures in relation to the
energy, water, waste, and eco-labelling applications for medium-sized tourist
sites in the Southern Mediterranean region. Additional pilot projects focused on
commercial models and developments to bolster green and socially responsible
business models for Tunisian eco-tourism. Through becoming internationally
certified based on ecotourism standards, and the development of an online
platform to nurture fair-trade products, Tunisia has been able to support
socially and environmentally responsible local producers.
SCP-NAP is one of the national
efforts to promote sustainable tourism as well as to create new job
opportunities. Moreover, it is also one of the mechanisms that incorporate
circular economy criteria such as waste streams in the Tunisian oil industry
sector. Finally, the Central Bank of Tunisia has been a member of the IFC/World
Bank’s Sustainable Banking Network to stimulate banking, as well as the
sustainable finance sector.
In Tunisia, various agencies and
relevant stakeholders have worked together to meet goals toward the circular
economy agenda. Among them are the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable
Development, Tunisia Ecotourism, ABCO (canned fish producer), Maklada Industries
(wires & cables producer), NOEL (kid’s shoe producer), SAIPH (pharmaceutical
laboratory), El Mensej (social company) and United Nations Industrial
Development Organization (UNIDO). Various national partners in Tunisia, Egypt,
Lebanon, and Morocco have been assisted by UNIDO’s experts to master the
national Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) database to promote awareness of the
framework for a Single Market for Green Products initiative. In addition, this
framework will be a driver for encouraging the implementation of greener
standards for national manufacturing businesses to compete in the EU market (Switch Med, 2018).
Table 4 below features various
SCP national action plans by Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Tunisia to promote
circular economy development in their countries.
Table 4: National Priorities as Expressed in
the SCP National Action Plans in the Selected North African Countries
MENA Country |
SCP National Action Plans |
Demonstration of Pilot Projects on
Circular Economy |
Egypt |
Policy instruments for its SCP program Integrated community development Sustainable agriculture Sustainable water management Sustainable and renewable energy applications Solid waste management |
Reducing plastic bag consumption
A sustainable public procurement assessment |
Jordan |
Agriculture and food industry Transport sector Waste management sector |
Improving solid waste management
Training in solid waste management |
Lebanon |
Adopt best available techniques to promote SCP in the industrial
sector Introduce SCP approaches related to the industrial sector in the
policy and institutional frameworks Educate and raise awareness among consumers in relation to SCP
in the industrial sector |
Composting winery waste |
Tunisia |
10-year framework action plan for the agri-food sector 10-year framework action plan for the tourism sector Coordination mechanism for SCP-NAP implementation |
Sustainable practices in eco-tourism Reinforcing the eco-tourism business model Recovering olive oil byproducts and waste Replacing lead in industrial paint |
Source: Switch
Med, 2018 – Switching to the Circular Economy in the Mediterranean
Furthermore, Table 5 shows the dimensions
covering efficient and sustainable resource use, natural capital protection,
green economic opportunities, and social
inclusion that contribute to the overall green growth index scores in 10 GCC
and North African countries. Efficient and Sustainable Resource Use (ESRU)
means using the Earth’s limited resources in a sustainable manner while minimizing
impacts on the environment. It allows us to create more with less and to
deliver greater value with less input. The indicators for natural capital
protection (NCP) consist of biodiversity and ecosystem protection,
environmental quality, GHG emissions reduction, and cultural and social value. Green Economic Opportunities (GEO) are defined
as low carbon, resource efficient, and socially inclusive, and where employment
growth and income are driven by public and private investment. Investment into sustainable
economic activities, infrastructure, and assets allow reduced carbon emissions
and pollution, enhanced energy and resource efficiency, and prevent the loss of
biodiversity and ecosystem services. The indicators for social inclusion (SI) consist
of social equality, social protection, gender balance, and access to basic
services and resources. Most of these countries scored low in NCP and GEO, with
index scores ranging between 23.41 to
61.75 and 11.79 to 46.16 respectively. However, most countries scored
moderately well for SI and ESRU. It is crucial for these countries to refocus
on greener infrastructure, sustainable resources, and resource efficiency to
improve their overall green growth index scores.
Table 5: Green
Growth Dimension Sub-Indices and Green Growth Index
Country |
Efficient
& Sustainable Resource Use (ESRU) |
Natural
Capital Protection (NCP) |
Green
Economic Opportunities (GEO) |
Social
Inclusion (SI) |
Green
Growth Index Scores |
Qatar |
47.94 |
36.00 |
12.66 |
55.69 |
33.22 |
UAE |
38.89 |
46.62 |
--- |
66.78 |
--- |
Saudi Arabia |
31.10 |
35.75 |
30.75 |
65.27 |
38.65 |
Bahrain |
30.24 |
23.41 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Oman |
32.37 |
41.63 |
29.10 |
--- |
--- |
Kuwait |
45.45 |
43.88 |
11.79 |
57.28 |
34.07 |
Egypt |
24.87 |
54.85 |
39.72 |
61.17 |
42.66 |
Jordan |
33.92 |
47.37 |
13.04 |
67.16 |
34.44 |
Lebanon |
44.09 |
56.10 |
24.49 |
51.56 |
42.04 |
Tunisia |
28.27 |
61.76 |
46.16 |
75.42 |
49.65 |
Source: GGGI Technical Report No. 16 – Green
Growth Index 2020: Measuring Performance in Achieving SDG Targets
Table 6 illustrates Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) Index Scores and Values for GCC and parts of North Africa for the Year 2022 from two perspectives – enablers score and performance score. The Enablers Score looks at policies and regulation; technology, knowledge and innovation; finance and investment; business environment and system resilience. The Performance Score looks at energy efficiency; renewable energy; electrification; nuclear energy; fuel switching; natural sinks; carbon capture, utilization and storage as well as hydrogen. Overall, almost all countries scored quite low in all fields, both in their enabler score as well as their performance scores, with the UAE performing better (Rank 17) as compared to the rest. These indicators can be used for the listed countries to benchmark with the others as well as to draft reliable policies and strategies to achieve better circular economy performance moving forward.
Table 6: Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) Index Scores and Values for GCC and North Africa for the Year 2022
ENABLER &
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SCORE |
Qatar (Rank) (Value) |
UAE (Rank) (Value) |
Saudi Arabia (Rank) (Value) |
Oman (Rank) (Value) |
Kuwait (Rank) (Value) |
Bahrain (Rank) (Value) |
Egypt (Rank) (Value) |
Jordan (Rank) (Value) |
Lebanon (Rank) (Value) |
Tunisia (Rank) (Value) |
Policies & Regulation |
20.59 (59) |
48.65 (27) |
40.95 (36) |
16.37 (64) |
17.47 (61) |
26.90 (52) |
30.50 (45) |
32.01 (42) |
31.07 (44) |
34.67 (40) |
Technology, Knowledge & Innovation |
33.18 (19) |
29.30 (21) |
23.28 (26) |
22.81 (28) |
18.45 (34) |
15.19 (43) |
17.53 (35) |
17.27 (36) |
14.97 (44) |
18.98 (33) |
Finance & Investment |
19.70 (34) |
50.02 (16) |
14.84 (44) |
23.30 (30) |
13.25 (49) |
24.36 (29) |
12.34 (50) |
15.37 (43) |
23.14 (31) |
9.15 (55) |
Business Environment |
59.72 (25) |
70.54 (12) |
62.84 (18) |
55.83 (34) |
54.67 (36) |
58.98 (27) |
48.15 (49) |
53.62 (40) |
45.01 (53) |
49.35 (47) |
System Resilience |
83.79 (5) |
67.01 (24) |
71.49 (13) |
68.93 (20) |
80.01 (9) |
66.19 (25) |
59.45 (34) |
65.03 (27) |
37.74 (52) |
60.31 (33) |
ENABLERS SCORE (RANK) |
43.40 (27) |
53.10 (17) |
42.68 (29) |
37.45 (35) |
36.77 (37) |
38.32 (34) |
33.60 (45) |
36.66 (38) |
30.39 (51) |
34.49 (44) |
Energy Efficiency |
26.91 (57) (0.1816) |
68.77 (35) (0.104) |
49.30 (50) (0.1401) |
24.33 (58) (0.1864) |
21.09 (60) (0.1924) |
0.00 (63) (0.2348) |
86.35 (17) (0.0714) |
80.69 (24) (0.0819) |
68.02 (39) (0.1054) |
74.16 (29) (0.094) |
Renewable Energy |
0.00 (63) (0.00) |
2.12 (54) (0.749) |
0.03 (62) (0.0173) |
0.00 (63) (0.0013) |
0.22 (60) (0.0822) |
0.31 (58) (0.114) |
4.78 (47) (1.6814) |
22.84 (19) (8.0111) |
5.99 (44) (2.104) |
6.02 (43) (2.1147) |
Electrification |
44.60 (37) (18.8623) |
49.61 (28) (20.7429) |
44.76 (36) (18.9241) |
27.64 (53) (12.5011) |
79.04 (3) (31.7823) |
99.39 (2) (39.413) |
57.21 (16) (23.5932) |
73.01 (6) (29.5195) |
74.61 (5) (30.1207) |
43.60 (38) (18.4876) |
Nuclear Energy |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.0039 (20) (0.0007) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
0.00 (21) (0.00) |
Fuel Switching |
33.33 (41) (33.3333) |
36.03 (29) (36.0349) |
57.104 (11) (57.1043) |
32.407 (43) (32.4068) |
67.427 (7) (67.4266) |
33.385 (38) (33.3848) |
49.998 (16) (49.9978) |
82.147 (3) (82.1473) |
8.512 (64) (8.5117) |
41.95 (23) (41.9496) |
Natural Sinks |
50.109 (5) (75.1641) |
68.98 (1) (100.00) |
66.894 (3) (99.9997) |
31.183 (34) (46.774) |
19.538 (58) (29.047) |
67.123 (2) (100.00) |
36.767 (27) (55.1291) |
42.676 (17) (63.1716) |
24.907 (50) (26.4404) |
22.17 (53) (29.7383) |
Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage |
52.36 (7) (0.0088) |
29.30 (8) (0.0049) |
4.75 (14) (0.0008) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
2.95 (18) (0.0005) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
0.00 (29) (0.00) |
Hydrogen |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
0.08 (22) (0.0019) |
53.84 (8) (1.2281) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
3.40 (16) (0.0775) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
0.00 (24) (0.00) |
PERFORMANCE SCORE (RANK) |
25.91 (34) |
31.86 (23) |
34.59 (18) |
14.44 (61) |
23.78 (43) |
25.02 (38) |
29.81 (26) |
37.67 (14) |
22.75 (50) |
23.49 (46) |
TOTAL CCE INDEX SCORE (RANK) |
34.66 (31) |
42.48 (17) |
38.63 (22) |
25.95 (50) |
30.38 (41) |
31.67 (39) |
31.70 (38) |
37.17 (25) |
26.57 (49) |
28.99 (44) |
Source: Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) Index 2022
(kapsarc.org)
Finally, Table
7 has mapped out various environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
initiatives adopted by numerous GCC and North African countries to facilitate
their ambitions to promote the implementation of the circular economy model
either through climate change and net zero commitments, sustainable finance,
social laws or policies, and governance aspects.
Table
7: Notable Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Related Laws, Regulations,
Sovereign Deals, and Policy Announcements in GCC and Selected North African Countries
in 2021
Country |
Climate Change and Net Zero Commitments |
Sustainable Finance |
Social Laws/Policies |
Governance |
Qatar |
Qatar aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2030 |
Qatar Stock Exchange Issued ESG index to identify the top 20 securities
that demonstrate the best ESG profile |
|
Qatar Stock Exchange (QSE) ESG Guidance issued in 2017 QSE is likely to introduce mandatory ESG disclosure requirements |
UAE |
Net Zero 2050 Strategic Initiative US $168bn funding commitment to renewable energy including Masdar
City $15bn pledge Hosting COP 28 in 2023 ADNOC Zero-Flaring objective Al Reyadah Abu Dhabi Carbon Capture Company |
Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week and related sub-events on
Sustainable Finance and Energy Including awarding of Zayed Sustainability
Prizes worth $3m. Government Sustainable Finance Framework 2021- 2031 Notable private sector transactions from Emirates, Etihad
Airlines, Al Futtaim DIFC Regulator DFSA ESG Hub announced in Q4 2021 TBD Mubadala ESG Unit The DFSA launched the Task Force on Sustainable Finance to support
best regulatory practices in sustainable finance standards in the DIFC |
Human Rights Institute / Law Federal Personal Data Privacy Law ADGM Data Protection
Regulations update New Labour Law enhancing
working conditions |
CB UAE ethical guidelines for FI’s use of enabling technology and
updated outsourcing regulations SCA requirement for ESG reporting for publicly listed companies SCA requirement of at least 1 female board member for publicly
listed companies Public Officials Accountability Law The Race Towards ESG Integration in the UAE public webinar
targeted at the private sector, hosted by the DIFC Academy on 31 August 2021 |
Saudi Arabia |
Net Zero 2060 Target National Renewable Energy Program to meet 50% of its domestic
energy needs from renewable sources by 2030 Circular Carbon Economy Framework and 4Rs Green Initiative to
plant 10 billion trees in KSA and across the ME region to mitigate emissions.
Environmental Law regulations issued July 2021 Waste Management Law issued August 2021 |
Red Sea tourism project secures $3.76bn in green financing Government funding announcement for green hydrogen energy plants Growing Sustainability –
ESG, stock exchanges and Tadawul’s role Limit the impact of external factors and adopt rules for fiscal
sustainability. Tadawul’s ESG disclosure guidelines |
Data Protection Law issued September 2021 |
Public Investment Fund (PIF) announcement of ESG Framework and
Green Bond Issuance |
Bahrain |
Net Zero 2060 Target
|
Sustainable Energy Authority tender announcement for 2 solar plant
projects pursuant to government pledge to cover 5% of electricity demand with
renewables by 2025. Bahrain Bourse (BHB) 7 December 2021 webinar titled ‘’Evolving
Bahrain’s ESG Landscape & Sustainable Financing.’’
|
Developments with regard to children’s rights Amending labor law to close the gender pay gap.
|
Bahrain Bourse (BHB) – publication on Sustainable Finance titled
“Evolving ESG Landscape & Capital Markets.” BHB joined the UN Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) initiative to
promote sustainable and transparent capital.
|
Oman |
Updates to its climate action plan in July to include a 7%
reduction in emissions by 2030. |
Green hydrogen plant project Muscat Stock Exchange (MSX) announced the institution of a new
section under the name of “ESG and D&I.” Central Bank of Morocco member of IFC/Word Bank’s Sustainable
Banking Network |
New Labour Law enhancing working conditions and annual leaves |
|
Kuwait |
New Kuwait 2035 Vision calls for the creation of sustainable
living |
One of the world’s biggest wealth funds targets sustainable
finance- Kuwait Investment Authority has applied the ESG standard set by an
independent globally recognized ESG benchmark provider. |
|
Boursa Kuwait launched its new ESG guide to raise awareness and
drive the embrace of Corporate Sustainability in the Kuwaiti capital market.
The guide aims to introduce the ESG universe to companies listed on the stock
exchange and highlight the benefits of ESG disclosure and best practices. |
Egypt |
Hosting UN COP 27 on Climate Change in November 2022 Update to its sustainable
development / climate change strategy Government funding commitments for green energy including more
solar plants and hydrogen projects (including transmission to African
countries) |
Central Bank circular to FI’s relating to a consultation about
sustainable finance guidelines / ESG guidelines in July 2021 Sovereign Green Bond issuance Increase SME financing from 20% to 25% Egypt Central Bank member of IFC/Word Bank’s Sustainable Banking
Network
|
Launching the “Closing the Gender Gap Accelerator” action plan in
2021 |
The development of new mechanisms for youth participation in
decision-making and the formulation of public policies Establishing a National Anti-Corruption Academy to enhance the
performance of the existing anti-corruption system |
Jordan |
National Energy Strategy 2020- 2030, aims to reduce the carbon
emissions by 10 % by 2030 and expand renewable energy’s share from 11 % in
2020 to 14 % in 2030 which is supported by the Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Law 2012 Climate Change integrated into Jordan National Green Growth Plan
2017-2025 |
|
|
Secured ranking of 5th MENA country on SDG Index Report
2021 |
Tunisia |
|
Central Bank of Tunisia member of IFC/Word Bank’s Sustainable
Banking Network |
|
|
Source: ESG Developments in the MENA and
GCC Region: Look Back 2021 and Look Ahead 2022
Generally, all GCC countries
carry a significant ecological footprint and are subject to domestic
environmental challenges like water scarcity, pollution and biodiversity, yet they
also bear witness to wider challenges like climate change and resource
depletion. Their national governments play a vital role in reinforcing green
and circular business regulations, along with facilitating the transition to a
circular economy by enforcing policies and regulations, implementing fiscal
incentives, expediting access to financing, strengthening capacity-building, and
knowledge dissemination along with research and development (R&D).
The most immediate challenges
that can significantly limit green businesses and circular economy in most of
the sectors in the GCC region are:
i)
Establishment
of viable business cases that justify the proposed CE program for the
evaluation in the start-up phase or as public subsidies with the hope to secure
credit or funding to promote circular projects.
ii)
Obstructive
regulations which do not support eco-innovative developments as well as disrupt
innovative business models, and inadequately promote the adoption of circular
strategies by companies.
iii)
Insufficient
knowledge and skills in support services to transform production processes and promote
circular economy strategies.
iv)
Conservative financial sector especially when
it comes to risky investments in circular economy projects.
v)
Insufficient
collaboration in supply chains and between market actors in waste management,
lack of information transfer on products and waste streams along with incoordination
to accomplish the circular economy objectives.
vi)
Lack of demand for green and circular
products and services in addition to limited market opportunities for green as
well as circular products and services.
Furthermore, there are general
institutional and political obstacles which are more complex to address such as
inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations because of unclear legal
frameworks, improper monitoring systems as well as insufficient financial
capacity; institutional weaknesses that can potentially avert initiatives’
coordination over different ministries, policies and sectors; corruption as
well as clientelism through lack of transparency in the award of the public
contract; bureaucracy and unclear regulations to acquire formal authorizations
along with environmental permits. To sum up, economic development, short-term
profits, and investments in non-sustainable sectors are prioritized over
environmental protection, and thus circular economy (COP21 Decision IG.24/13,
2021).
There is currently ample opportunity
for a circular economy in the GCC region, especially when it comes to the
construction sector, as the region is rapidly developing and refurbishing its
infrastructure. This period of vast construction presents an opportunity to
future-proof the designs of the buildings as the planning is happening.
Contractors and builders can optimize the future use of buildings by planning
and developing partnerships between owners and operators, enabling them to
enhance the performance and value of the property with new, sustainable
materials and equipping them with technology that can support sustainable
operations for years to come (Popplewell, Marino, and Boyd, 2020). In addition
to development, the circular economy can also inspire the development of
policies and strategies in relation to the mobility and transportation sectors (Ellen
MacArthur Foundation (EMF), 2019) as well as various business models in real
estate such as adaptable assets, relocatable buildings, flexible spaces,
performance procurement, and residual value (Acharya, Boyd, and Finch, 2020).
With regard to the energy sector,
there is immense opportunity for supporting sustainable development. There is
significant potential to use carbon capture and storage (CCS) in
energy-intensive industries in the GCC countries such as cement production,
iron and steel, and petrochemicals. For example, Qatar has taken substantial
steps toward the establishment of a national CCS framework through the launch
of the largest carbon recovery and sequestration facility in the region (Meltzer,
Hultman, and Langley, 2014, p. 24).
The SWOT Analysis Map in Figure
1 below sums up the potential for the development of a
circular economy in various economies in the GCC region. SWOT Analysis is a
method to identify and analyze internal strengths and weaknesses and external
opportunities and threats on the readiness to foster the development of a circular
economy and its possible impacts in the GCC region.
Figure 2: SWOT Analysis on the Potentiality
of the Development of Circular Economy in Various Countries in the GCC Region
STRENGTHS (S) -
Optimization approach
for better and more efficient use of materials especially in the building and
construction sector. -
Supportive policies, regulations,
and strategies have been drafted and implemented to stimulate the mobility
concept and sustainable transportation. -
Focus on smart as well
as a synergistic specialization on strategic sectors that are important for
circular economy development.
|
WEAKNESSES (W) -
Insufficient knowledge
and skills to promote a circular economy across businesses and industries. -
Inadequate enforcement
of environmental regulations due to the unclear legal framework, improper
monitoring system, and unsatisfactory financial capacity. |
OPPORTUNITIES (O) -
Significant potential
to utilize carbon capture and storage (CCS) in energy-intensive industries. -
Potential
collaboration or cooperation with other regions, for example, the European
Union (EU) through transferable best practices and lessons learned in the
circular economy. -
Good facilitation by
national governments to reinforce green as well as circular businesses
through fiscal incentives, capacity-building programs, etc. |
THREATS (T) -
Limited market
opportunities for green products or services to stimulate the development of
green businesses as well as a circular economy. -
Lack of demand for
green products and services to promote green businesses and a circular
economy. -
Poor participation
amongst the supply chain along with market actors or stakeholders especially
in the waste management sector. -
Possible effect of a
circular economy model on the labor market, which can incur high transition
costs. |
Source: Author’s own compilation
The European Union Green Deal was
set as a transformational change blueprint to transform the EU into a fair and
prosperous society with a modernized, competitive, and resource-efficient
economy by tackling the climate change and environmental degradation problem.
The Green Deal aims to achieve zero net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050, and
to stimulate economic growth that is inclusive and independent of resource use.
Additionally, the Green Deal is
a roadmap to prepare the EU’s economy sustainably by turning climate and
environmental challenges into opportunities across all policy areas. The
European Green Deal aims to boost the efficient use of resources by moving to a
clean, circular economy and offsetting climate change, reverting biodiversity
loss, and diminishing pollution. It
outlines investments needed and financing tools available and explains how to
ensure a just and inclusive transition. The European Green Deal covers all
sectors of the economy, notably transport, energy, agriculture, and industries
such as construction, steel, cement, ICT, textiles, and chemicals.
The European Commission (EC) endorsed
a new Circular Economy Action Plan in March 2020 for the period 2020 – 2024
with 35 actions along the entire life cycle of products (Fujiwara, N, Rizos, V.,
and Ferrer J. N., 2017). In addition, another circular economy package, namely EU
Action Plan for the Circular Economy (CEAP) II, has been adopted with the
intention of boosting global competitiveness, fostering sustainable economic
growth, and generating new jobs. It consists of two EU Action Plans for the
Circular Economy (2015 and 2020), with measures covering the full life cycle of
products: from production and consumption to waste management and the market
for secondary raw materials. Building on the work done on the circular economy
since 2015, the CEAP II focuses on resource-intensive sectors where the
potential for circularity is high. Aiming to keep resources in economic cycles,
if possible, the plan addresses key product value chains: electronics and ICT,
batteries and vehicles, packaging, plastics, textiles, and food.
This plan’s objective is to initiate
a coherent product policy framework for the development of more sustainable and
circular value chains which integrate the various actions under six key
pillars. The six key pillars are:
a)
Sustainable Product Policy Framework – Action
on the eco-design front to improve product durability, reusability,
upgradability, and reparability, as well as increase the amount of recycled
content and material in newly developed products.
b)
Key Product Value Chains – Several legislative
and other initiatives are foreseen for electronics and ICT, batteries and
vehicles, packaging, plastics, textiles, construction and buildings, food,
water, nutrients, and other product groups according to their environmental
footprint and level of circularity conduciveness.
c)
Less Waste, More Value – The introduction of
specific waste reduction targets and incentives for more complex streams such
as digitalization and product-as-service business models.
d)
Making Circularity Work for People, Regions,
and Cities – Measures to support skills and job creation.
e)
Cross-cutting Actions – Development of metrics
for measuring the impact of circularity on climate change mitigation and
adaptation.
f) Leading Efforts at the Global Level –
Recognizes the importance of global value chains and the need for global
cooperation. This pillar also updated and enhanced the “Monitoring Framework
for the Circular Economy” which was originally introduced in 2018 (European Commission, 2020b).
The EU Green
Deal can be a good model for GCC countries to adopt in promoting a circular
economy through the following strategies:
a) Setting up an ambitious and reliable target to
achieve a circular economy
b)
Rethinking an affordable and clean
energy program
c)
Building an energy and resource
efficiency roadmap to accomplish the circular economy model
d)
Creating more environmentally friendly
ecosystems to govern sustainable biodiversity, pollution, and smart approaches
in critical sectors such as building and construction, oil and gas,
infrastructure, etc.
The promotion of a circular
economy in the GCC region can be supported through inclusive efforts as well as
the programs below:
·
Smart
partnership with regional organizations to collaborate inclusively on various
issues that can promote better environmental performance through circular economy
practice and prepare transformative programs and policies along with cutting-edge
analytics altogether with technical assistance such as climate finance for
better management of shared natural resources, resilience as well as capacity
building (The World Bank Group, 2021).
·
Dynamic
cooperation with financial institutions to stimulate multi-actor partnerships
between government, businesses, and consumer groups along with the financial
sector’s stakeholders such as development banks and national financial
institutions to support national climate and development priorities.
·
Intensification
of partnerships with various national and international organizations, such as
national ministries, cities, local public institutions, businesses, and
relevant non-governmental organizations, with the aim of better collaboration
on climate-related action plans. Knowledge partnership with academia, think
tanks, civil society, and youth networks to establish a platform for knowledge
sharing, as well as the exchange of ideas to create, support, and raise
awareness for the circular economy efforts.
·
Food
systems, water security, and resilient natural capital by promoting
climate-smart agri-food systems that can minimize the impact of growing food
insecurity with high import dependency; strengthening climate-sensitive and climate-smart
water resource management; and creating resilient natural capital by integrating
climate considerations into natural capital management policies.
·
Reduce
GHG emissions and improve air quality by prioritizing energy transition and low
carbon mobility policies; design diversification strategies that aim at long-term
emissions reductions and prioritize higher shares of renewable energy in the
energy mix (The World Bank Group, 2021).
·
Develop
climate-smart cities and resilient coastal economies as future engines of
economic growth for the MENA region. Climate-smart spatial planning as well as
vital investments can realize carbon neutrality goals and create resilient
cities that offer improved quality of living for residents. Climate-smart urban
planning and development will also stimulate economic growth by providing and
ensuring job opportunities for generations to come, ensure climate-smart public
services in critical areas of public services such as water, sanitation, and
waste management, and develop resilient coastal economies through integration
between coastal management and climate adaptive coastal economies.
·
Sustainable
finance for climate action by greening the financial institution systems along
with the instruments through which they collaborate with national and private
sector institutions, addressing transition risks to the economy for better
policy formulation to accomplish resilient financial institutions and
governance; and unleashing green financing for climate-smart investments with
the support of national budgets and expenditures as well as private capital
allocation for green investments.
In summary, transitioning
to a circular economy in the GCC and MENA regions will greatly benefit the
economy as well as help in achieving current commitments in terms of climate change.
Measures taken to decouple economic progress from the wasteful use of natural
resources can actually promote prosperity, cut emissions in half, and
contribute toward the global goal of reducing the temperature by 1.5 degrees
Celsius by 2030. Following blueprints laid out by regional neighbors like the
European Union, the MENA/GCC policymakers have an advantage in that they can
adopt similar policies and then adapt those policies to suit their economic
interests. It can’t be understated that achieving environmental sustainability
does not have to come at the expense of economic gains, and in fact can
contribute to stimulating economic growth by providing job opportunities,
increasing the value and quality of products and goods, and providing long-term
security.
Recent statistics
indicate a CE would increase GCC countries’ gross domestic product (GDP) by USD
approx. 100 billion, generate between 200,000 and 300,000 jobs, significantly
improve people’s quality of life and create attractive growth opportunities for
the private sector. Based on international best practices, concrete, cement,
and plastic could potentially be collected at 95%, metals at 97%, and bio-waste
at 90% in the GCC region although the ultimate ambition for recycling rates for
concrete and cement have been set at 95%, plastic at 75%, metal at 95%, and
bio-waste at 80%. Additionally, GCC projected waste collection and recycling
volumes are targeted at approximately 280 million and 320 million tons
respectively by 2040. The joint WBCSD-BCG study indicates a 91% collection and
87% recycling and composting rate across all waste streams – plastic, concrete
and cement, metal, and bio-waste with a potential investment of USD60 billion
to 85 billion by 2040 (GPCA, 2022). In summary, the transition to a CE undertakes
economic gains through job creation, economic growth, diversification,
self-sufficiency, and independence from external regulatory pressures.
Therefore, the GCC can contribute to a global economy that will use the earth’s
materials responsibly and preserve its resources for future generations at both
government as well as organizational levels.
Acharya,
Devni, Richard Boyd, and Olivia Finch. "From Principles to Practices:
First steps towards a circular built environment." ARUP, Ellen MacArthur
Foundation (2018). Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/First-steps-towards-acircular-built-environment-2018.pdf (Last Accessed on 12th November 2022).
Acharya, D., R. Boyd, and O. Finch. "From Principles to Practices: Realizing the value of circular economy in real estate." Ellen MacArthur Foundation & Arup (2020). Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/Realising-the-value-of-circulareconomy-in-real-estate.pdf(Last Accessed on 21st November 2022).
Al-Alawi, B., G. Cavallari, H. Cindric, M. Gargallo, N.
Hegazy, S. Saqib, H. Shaka, and G. Tibi. "State of Play for Circular Built
Environment in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries." A report
compiling the regional state of play for circularity in the built environment
in Gulf Cooperation Council countries across Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (2021).
Al-Alawi, Baqir, Giulia Cavallari, Hrvoje Cindric, Mercedes
Gargallo, Nermin Hegazy, Samima Saqib, Huda Shaka, and Ghaith Tibi.
"Circular Built Environment" (2020).
Alsabbagh, Maha, and Waheeb Essa Alnaser. "Transitioning
to Carbon Neutrality in Bahrain: A Policy Brief." Arab Gulf Journal of
Scientific Research ahead-of-print (2022). Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-03-2022-0004.
Azar, Elie, and Mohamed Abdel Raouf. Sustainability in the
Gulf. Routledge (2018). Available at:
https://wwwtaylorfrancis-com.aus.idm.oclc.org/books/e/97813151748.
Bahrain
eGovernment Portal, bahrain.bh (2021). Bahrain Economic Vision 2030.
Bee’ah. “Bee’Ah Wins Inaugural MEED ‘Sustainable Business of
the Year’ Award”. Bee’ah (2017). [online] Beeah.ae. Available at:
https://beeah.ae/en/news/bee-ah-wins-inaugural-meed-sustainable-business-of-the-year-award.
Bejjani, M., Y. Anouti, A. Klat, and J. Batal. "Putting
GCC cities in the loop: Sustainable growth in a circular economy.
Strategy&." (2019). 1st ed. [ebook] Strategy& PwC. Available at:
https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/reports/putting-gcc-cities-in-the-loop.pdf.
Brown, J. Jed, Probir Das, and Mohammad Al-Saidi.
"Sustainable agriculture in the Arabian/Persian Gulf region utilizing
marginal water resources: making the best of a bad situation." Sustainability 10,
no. 5 (2018): 1364.
Callen, Tim, Reda Cherif, Fuad Hasanov, Amgad Hegazy, and
Padamja Khandelwal. Economic diversification in the GCC: Past, present, and
future. International Monetary Fund, 2014.
Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1412.pdf.
Circle Economy. “The Circularity Gap, 2021.” Circle Economy
(2021). Available at https://www.circularity-gap.world/2021.
Circular Carbon Economy (CCE).
“Circular Carbon Economy Index.” Kapsarc (2022). Available at https://cceindex.kapsarc.org/cceindex/home
Circular Economy Policy Paper, Invest Qatar-Circular Economy
Policy Paper.pdf. Available at https://www.invest.qa/en/insights/publications.
COP21 Decision IG.24/13. “Regional Summary of Policy
Recommendations to Support the Development of Green and Circular Business in
the Mediterranean.” SwitchMed (2021). Available at
https://switchmed.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SwitchMed_Regional-Summary-of-Policy-Recommendations.pdf(Last Accessed on 20th November 2022).
El-Katiri, L., Khalid, A., Mills, R., Salman, M., Ibrahim, R.
and Ferroukhi, R. “Renewable Energy: Market Analysis – GCC 2019.” IRENA (2019).
Available at: https://tinyurl.com/4p6r89cc.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). “Planning Effective
Transport of People, Products and Materials”. Ellen MacArthur Foundation
(2019). Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/1_Mobility_Planning_Mar19.pdf.
ESG Developments in the MENA and GCC
Region. “Look Back 2021 and Look Ahead 2022.” Tamimi (2022) Available at: https://tinyurl.com/9vc4y2xk.
EU-GCC Dialogue on Economic Diversification. “Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia Circular Economy Overview – for the Circular Economy Assignment”
(2020b).
European Commission. “Circular Economy Action Plan: For a
cleaner and more competitive Europe.” Communication from the Commission to the
European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee
and the Committee of the Regions (2020b).
Fujiwara, N, Rizos, V., and Ferrer J. N. “Study on Circular
Economy developments in the GCC region and opportunities for collaboration with
the European Union.” (2017).
Global Footprint Network. “Carbon makes up 60% of world's ecological
footprint.” Global Footprint Network (2016). Available at https://tinyurl.com/ffvh9bbz.
Growth Green Growth Institute (GGGI) Technical Report No. 16.
“Green Growth Index 2020: Measuring Performance in Achieving SDG Targets.” GGGI
(2020). Available at https://greengrowthindex.gggi.org/?page_id=3126.
G20 Climate Stewardship Working Group. “Managing Emissions in
the Context of the Circular Carbon Economy Platform.” September (2020).
Available at https://tinyurl.com/2x68ztkf.
Gulf Intelligence Consultancy (2017). Oman Energy Master Plan
2040 – Progress Report 2015 – 2017. Gulf Intelligence Consultancy Publishing.
Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA) (2022).
“Addressing Barriers to Circularity in the GCC”. Available at https://www.gpca.org.ae/2022/12/15/addressing-barriers-to-circularity-in-the-gcc/
Howarth, N. et al. “Green Growth Pathways for Saudi Arabia.”
KAPSARC (2020).
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES),
Intersecting – Bending the Linear Economy on Plastics, Volume 07/2021 (2021).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014. Climate
Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to
the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva,
Switzerland, 151 pp (2014).
Jordan’s Ministry of Environment. “National Strategy and
Action Plan for Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) in Jordan 2016 –
2025.” UNEP (2016).
Karagulian, Federico, Claudio A. Belis, Carlos Francisco C.
Dora, Annette M. Prüss-Ustün, Sophie Bonjour, Heather Adair-Rohani, and Markus
Amann. "Contributions to Cities' Ambient Particulate Matter (PM): A Systematic
Review of Local Source Contributions at Global Level." Atmospheric Environment
120 (2015): 475-483.
Lebanon Voluntary National Review (VNR). “Lebanon VNR on
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).” United Nations (2018). Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19484Lebanon_VNR_2018.pdf
(Last Accessed on 21st November 2022).
Maamoun, N. “A Just Transition Towards a Circular Economy:
Existing Policies in Egypt.” Alternative Policy Solution (2021). Available https://aps.aucegypt.edu/en/articles/735/a-just-transition-towards-a-circular-economy-existing-policies-in-egypt#subscribe(Last Accessed on 3rd November 2022).
Meltzer, Joshua, Nathan E. Hultman, and Claire Langley.
"Low-carbon energy transitions in Qatar and the Gulf cooperation council
region." Brookings papers on economic activity (2014). Available at:
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/low-carbon-energytransitions-qatar-meltzer-hultman-full.pdf.
MENARA. “Sustainable Development in the MENA Region.” MENARA
Future Notes No.20 (March 2019). Available at https://tinyurl.com/e8rejf3p.
Moossa, Buzaina, Priyank Trivedi, Haleema Saleem, and Syed
Javaid Zaidi. "Desalination in the GCC countries-a review." Journal
of Cleaner Production (2022): 131717.
Oman Vision 2040 – Implementation Follow-Up Unit. Available
at: https://www.oman2040.om/index-en.html#
Organization for Economic Co-operation and development (OECD). “Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060.” OECD Publishing (2018). Available at:
https://www.oecd.org/environment/waste/highlights-global-materialresourcesoutlook-to2060.pdf.
Planning Statistics Authority Qatar. “Qatar's 2nd National
Development Strategy 2018-2022.” Planning Statistics Authority, State of Qatar
(2019).
Popplewell, H., Marino, J. and Boyd, R. “Circular Economy
Principles for Building Services.” Research Insight 2nd Ed. (2020). Available
at: https://www.cibse.org/knowledge/knowledgeitems/detail?id=a0q3Y00000HseruQAB#.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). “The Rise of Circularity-How
the GCC is Transforming from the Inside for the Outside (Oil and Gas &
Chemicals).” PwC (2021 (1)).
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). “The Rise of Circularity-How
the GCC is Transforming from the Inside for the Outside (Power and Utilities).”
PwC (2021 (2)).
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). “The Rise of Circularity-How
the GCC is Transforming from the Inside for the Outside (Metals and Mining).”
PwC (2021 (3)).
Qatar. “Qatar’s Circular Economy – Policy Paper.” State of
Qatar (2022). Available at https://www.invest.qa/insights/publications/OTQ=?signature=c18282572a2cbf3bedf9464ae71c2c8a4d9b833a7a5e9391dd0501b367694c99(Last Accessed on 31st October 2022).
Qatar. “Qatar’s Sustainable Economic Transition. “State of
Qatar (August 2022). Available at https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/news/report-how-qatar-confronting-environmental-and-social-challenge.
Qatar Second National Development Strategy (Qatar 2nd
NDS) 2018 – 2022. Qatar Planning and Statistics Authority.
Qatar Government Communication Office, 2023 – Qatar National
Vision 2030. Government Communications Office, Council of Ministers.
Rizos, Vasileios, Katja Tuokko, and Arno Behrens. "The
Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts." CEPS
Papers 12440 (2017).
Sustainable Energy Authority (SEA), Kingdom of Bahrain
(2021). National renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP). Available at: sea.gov.bh/nreap.
Supreme Council for Environment. “Bahrain’s third national
communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change.”
State of Bahrain (2020). Available at:
Switch Med. “Switching to the Circular Economy in the
Mediterranean.” Switch Med (2018). Available at https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2020-01/SwitchMed-newspaper-Third%20edition.pdf.
Switch Med in Jordan, 2020.
https://switchmed.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Factsheet-SwitchMed-demo-Jordan-Aqaba-07.04.2020.pdf(Last Accessed on 9th November 2022).
Switch2Green. “The EU Green Deal – A Roadmap to Sustainable
Economies.” Switch2Green (2022). Available at:
https://www.switchtogreen.eu/the-eu-green-deal-promoting-a-green-notable-circular-economy.
United Arab Emirates (UAE). “UAE’s Circular Economy Council
Holds Inaugural Meetings on “Scale 360” Initiative.” Government of UAE (2022).
Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2b4czfk6 (Last Accessed on31st October 2022).
United Arab Emirates (UAE). “UAE Green Key Performance
Indicator” MOCCAE (2022). Available at https://tinyurl.com/2vryzzzu(Last Accessed on 30th October 2022).
United Arab Emirates (UAE). “UAE National Sustainable
Production & Consumption Plan (2019-2030) Framework.” MOCCAE 2022.
Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2p8xjmvd (Last Accessed on 30th October2022).
United Nations. “The State of Qatar Second Voluntary National
Review.” The State of Qatar (2018).
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). “A Small Island
with Big Plans: The Kingdom of Bahrain Commits to Environmental Sustainability.”
UNEP (2019). Available at: https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/small-island-bigplans-kingdom-bahrain-commits-environmental-sustainability.
Williams, E. “Achieving climate goals by closing the loop in
a circular carbon economy.” KAPSARC, November (2019).
World Bank Group. “Middle East & North Africa Climate
Roadmap (2021 – 2025) – Driving Transformational Climate Action and Green
Recovery in MENA.” World Bank Group (2021). Available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/mena/publication/middle-east-north-africa-climate-roadmap.
World Population Review (2022). Available at:
https://www.worldpopulationreview.com
Zafar, S. “Waste Management Outlook for the Middle East.” The
Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability, pp.159–181 (2018).
Zafar, S. “Recycling of Plastics.” EcoMENA (2020). Available at: https://www.ecomena.org/recycling-reuse-plastics.